Bristol Digest, Vol 604, Issue 3

Send Bristol mailing list submissions to
bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bristol-request@mailman.lug.org.uk

You can reach the person managing the list at
bristol-owner@mailman.lug.org.uk

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Bristol digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: Please cancel this! (Jamie Lokier)
2. Re: Please cancel this! (2966710 .)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:13:57 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Please cancel this!
Message-ID: <20150611171357.GE5149@jl-vm1.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Ioan Loosley wrote:
> It was proably better not to highlight it, informing people of the
> uninteional sending causes the [1]Streisand effect and causes the
> reverse effect by making people read it. kind of like this,
> [2]http://redd.it/361fyq

I wonder if it was better to follow up in private rather than public
about it being better to not highlight it, due to risk of increasing
the Streisand effect ;)

Best,
-- Jamie



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:45:09 +0100
From: "2966710 ." <us.redpumas@gmail.com>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Please cancel this!
Message-ID:
<CACeWpzgg9AEh-+2Y-p7AYj7-FtNNxma2xEdptA-Wzzqc7o6asw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 11 June 2015 at 18:13, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:
> Ioan Loosley wrote:
>> It was proably better not to highlight it, informing people of the
>> uninteional sending causes the [1]Streisand effect and causes the
>> reverse effect by making people read it. kind of like this,
>> [2]http://redd.it/361fyq
>
> I wonder if it was better to follow up in private rather than public
> about it being better to not highlight it, due to risk of increasing
> the Streisand effect ;)
>
> Best,
> -- Jamie

Better for whom? Not Streisand that's for sure, now I've seen the photo too.

Steve



------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Bristol mailing list
Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol

------------------------------

End of Bristol Digest, Vol 604, Issue 3
***************************************