bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
bristol-request@mailman.lug.org.uk
You can reach the person managing the list at
bristol-owner@mailman.lug.org.uk
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Bristol digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Problems Making Bootable Stick (Peter Hemmings)
2. Redundant/failover system (Martin Moore)
3. Re: Redundant/failover system (mark chard)
4. Re: Redundant/failover system (Martin Moore)
5. Re: Redundant/failover system (mark chard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:29:31 +0100
From: Peter Hemmings <peternsomerset@virginmedia.com>
To: David Fear <david@dfear.co.uk>, Bristol and Bath Linux User Group
<bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Problems Making Bootable Stick
Message-ID: <3684d741-6f86-ae26-7423-d521e49a1b9a@virginmedia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Dave,
I have looked at that and some others but most are for windoze and I
just think that by now ther should be an easy way to do it!
I may revert to the "dreaded" S/W but have found there are some linux
usb files and instructions in the UBCD (the S/W I want to put on the
stick) folder, so will try that next.
Its not too difficult but I had hoped for a nice Linux GUI to do the job.
On 17/09/16 14:47, David Fear via Bristol wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would use easy2boot. It has instructions on how to create the disk
> on linux and any special instructions need to put UBCD on the usb stick.
>
> I created an easy2boot stick the other day and it is utter genius and
> magic. Although I did create the stick with windows, not linux.
>
> --
> Regards
>
> -----------------------------------
> Dave Fear :: david@dfear.co.uk
>
> Order your free giffgaff SIM card through my page and get 5 pounds
> free credit http://t.co/z1KJF5y
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bristol mailing list
> Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
--
Peter H
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:07:49 +0100
From: Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
Message-ID: <03CD9C91-E17B-45B5-B4F2-26DD7DE193FB@it-helps.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I have a requirement for an automatic redundant/failover system.
It's on an intranet rather than the internet.
Currently use Debian, but if essential could use another flavour, but as you can imagine, would rather not!
The current system is a single server running Apache and Postgres (with Slony to a backup system on another site with a separate URL– this needs to be the same URL or even ip so transparent to the user ) – nothing fancy really.
Clearly there will need to be two servers, I'd rather keep the number of other servers to a minimum (or none if possible J ). Don't want any 'false' switchovers either.
What are my options?
Cheers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/private/bristol/attachments/20160917/084d6013/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:33:58 +0100
From: mark chard <machard.1984@gmail.com>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>,
Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
Message-ID:
<CAA7DJ2nOUK53hMksSfLy3wya04nVtd_B6Tm8WP0-vAciDypUhw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Take a look at pacemaker
On 17 Sep 2016 7:08 pm, "Martin Moore via Bristol" <
bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
> I have a requirement for an automatic redundant/failover system.
>
>
>
> It's on an intranet rather than the internet.
>
>
>
> Currently use Debian, but if essential could use another flavour, but as
> you can imagine, would rather not!
>
>
>
> The current system is a single server running Apache and Postgres (with
> Slony to a backup system on another site with a separate URL– this needs to
> be the same URL or even ip so transparent to the user ) – nothing fancy
> really.
>
>
>
> Clearly there will need to be two servers, I'd rather keep the number of
> other servers to a minimum (or none if possible J ). Don't want any
> 'false' switchovers either.
>
>
>
> What are my options?
>
>
>
> Cheers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bristol mailing list
> Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/private/bristol/attachments/20160917/922765aa/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:26:19 +0100
From: Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
Message-ID: <EBE78444-531D-4D5D-9011-B881B1AC9E09@it-helps.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cheers – looks just the ticket.
However, it appears to use Nginx ( https://wiki.debian.org/Debian-HA/ClustersFromScratch ) . Is that as part of the HA system or will I need to switch from
Apache as my web-server?
From: mark chard <machard.1984@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 19:33
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>, Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
Take a look at pacemaker
On 17 Sep 2016 7:08 pm, "Martin Moore via Bristol" <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
I have a requirement for an automatic redundant/failover system.
It's on an intranet rather than the internet.
Currently use Debian, but if essential could use another flavour, but as you can imagine, would rather not!
The current system is a single server running Apache and Postgres (with Slony to a backup system on another site with a separate URL– this needs to be the same URL or even ip so transparent to the user ) – nothing fancy really.
Clearly there will need to be two servers, I'd rather keep the number of other servers to a minimum (or none if possible ☺ ). Don't want any 'false' switchovers either.
What are my options?
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
Bristol mailing list
Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:36:24 +0100
From: mark chard <machard.1984@gmail.com>
To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>,
Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
Message-ID:
<CAA7DJ2=Oc--ZLaVdbwcf+49LKeytxBYF4Wmzos5aT9poMHywNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
There are many ways to configure pacemaker. It works with Apache too
On 17 Sep 2016 8:26 pm, "Martin Moore via Bristol" <
bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
> Cheers – looks just the ticket.
>
> However, it appears to use Nginx ( https://wiki.debian.org/
> Debian-HA/ClustersFromScratch ) . Is that as part of the HA system or
> will I need to switch from
> Apache as my web-server?
>
>
>
>
> From: mark chard <machard.1984@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, 17 September 2016 at 19:33
> To: Bristol and Bath Linux User Group <bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk>,
> Martin Moore <martinm@it-helps.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [bristol] Redundant/failover system
>
> Take a look at pacemaker
>
> On 17 Sep 2016 7:08 pm, "Martin Moore via Bristol" <
> bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote:
> I have a requirement for an automatic redundant/failover system.
>
> It's on an intranet rather than the internet.
>
> Currently use Debian, but if essential could use another flavour, but as
> you can imagine, would rather not!
>
> The current system is a single server running Apache and Postgres (with
> Slony to a backup system on another site with a separate URL– this needs to
> be the same URL or even ip so transparent to the user ) – nothing fancy
> really.
>
> Clearly there will need to be two servers, I'd rather keep the number of
> other servers to a minimum (or none if possible ☺ ). Don't want any
> 'false' switchovers either.
>
> What are my options?
>
> Cheers.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bristol mailing list
> Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bristol mailing list
> Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/private/bristol/attachments/20160917/27e42b80/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Bristol mailing list
Bristol@mailman.lug.org.uk
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bristol
------------------------------
End of Bristol Digest, Vol 661, Issue 4
***************************************
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar